Tuesday, August 23, 2016

2016 MLB Relative Power Index (RPI),as of the games of August 21,2016 from ESPN.GO.COM

MLB RPI Rankings

RK TEAM RPI W L PCT SOS PWR RS RA EXPW-L EXPWP
1 Chicago Cubs .529 78 45 .634 .494 0 631 423 85-38 .690
2 Texas Rangers .524 73 52 .584 .504 0 582 581 63-62 .501
3 Toronto Blue Jays .523 70 54 .565 .509 0 596 501 73-51 .586
4 Cleveland Indians .521 71 51 .582 .501 0 616 511 72-50 .592
5 Washington Nationals .519 73 50 .593 .494 0 600 455 78-45 .635
6 Boston Red Sox .519 69 54 .561 .505 0 677 561 73-50 .593
7 Baltimore Orioles .516 67 56 .545 .507 0 579 561 63-60 .516
8 Seattle Mariners .511 66 57 .537 .502 0 579 528 67-56 .546
9 Detroit Tigers .511 65 59 .524 .506 0 571 562 63-61 .508
10 Kansas City Royals .509 64 60 .516 .506 0 495 518 59-65 .477
11 St. Louis Cardinals .508 66 57 .537 .498 0 614 533 70-53 .570
12 San Francisco Giants .506 68 56 .548 .491 0 556 507 68-56 .546
13 New York Yankees .505 63 60 .512 .503 0 510 539 58-65 .472
14 Houston Astros .505 64 60 .516 .501 0 569 523 67-57 .542
15 Los Angeles Dodgers .505 68 55 .553 .489 0 549 490 68-55 .557
16 Pittsburgh Pirates .502 62 59 .512 .498 0 549 547 61-60 .502
17 Chicago White Sox .500 59 64 .480 .507 0 493 538 56-67 .456
18 Miami Marlins .499 65 59 .524 .491 0 528 514 64-60 .513
19 New York Mets .497 62 62 .500 .497 0 469 479 61-63 .489
20 Colorado Rockies .493 60 64 .484 .496 0 660 642 64-60 .514
21 Philadelphia Phillies .487 58 67 .464 .494 0 473 593 49-76 .389
22 Tampa Bay Rays .486 52 70 .426 .506 0 516 530 59-63 .487
23 Los Angeles Angels .485 52 72 .419 .507 0 550 593 57-67 .462
24 Oakland Athletics .485 53 71 .427 .504 0 495 596 51-73 .408
25 Cincinnati Reds .484 53 70 .431 .502 0 548 655 51-72 .412
26 San Diego Padres .479 53 71 .427 .496 0 544 602 56-68 .450
27 Arizona Diamondbacks .477 51 73 .411 .499 0 561 690 49-75 .398
28 Milwaukee Brewers .477 53 70 .431 .492 0 504 590 52-71 .422
29 Minnesota Twins .475 49 75 .395 .502 0 562 661 52-72 .420
30 Atlanta Braves .465 45 79 .363 .499 0 451 604 44-80 .358

No comments:

Post a Comment