Sunday, September 11, 2016

2016 MLB Relative Power Index (RPI),as of the games of September 10,2016 from ESPN.GO.COM

MLB RPI Rankings

RK TEAM RPI W L PCT SOS PWR RS RA EXPW-L EXPWP
1 Texas Rangers .530 85 58 .594 .508 0 695 673 74-69 .516
2 Chicago Cubs .529 90 51 .638 .493 0 700 478 96-45 .682
3 Cleveland Indians .520 82 59 .582 .499 0 693 590 82-59 .580
4 Baltimore Orioles .519 77 64 .546 .510 0 674 641 74-67 .525
5 Toronto Blue Jays .519 78 63 .553 .507 0 681 594 80-61 .568
6 Washington Nationals .518 84 58 .592 .494 0 675 531 88-54 .618
7 Boston Red Sox .517 79 62 .560 .503 0 779 619 86-55 .613
8 New York Yankees .515 76 65 .539 .507 0 603 608 70-71 .496
9 Detroit Tigers .513 76 65 .539 .504 0 648 635 72-69 .510
10 Houston Astros .510 75 67 .528 .505 0 649 607 76-66 .533
11 Seattle Mariners .510 74 68 .521 .507 0 679 641 75-67 .529
12 Kansas City Royals .510 73 68 .518 .507 0 586 594 70-71 .493
13 Los Angeles Dodgers .508 80 61 .567 .488 0 634 557 80-61 .564
14 New York Mets .503 75 67 .528 .495 0 561 540 74-68 .519
15 St. Louis Cardinals .503 75 66 .532 .494 0 696 618 79-62 .559
16 San Francisco Giants .503 76 65 .539 .491 0 629 565 78-63 .553
17 Chicago White Sox .500 68 73 .482 .506 0 591 623 67-74 .474
18 Pittsburgh Pirates .495 69 71 .493 .496 0 628 640 69-71 .491
19 Miami Marlins .492 70 72 .493 .491 0 579 584 70-72 .496
20 Los Angeles Angels .491 62 79 .440 .509 0 633 655 68-73 .483
21 Colorado Rockies .490 68 74 .479 .494 0 754 738 73-69 .511
22 Tampa Bay Rays .487 59 82 .418 .510 0 595 631 66-75 .471
23 Oakland Athletics .487 60 81 .426 .507 0 548 678 56-85 .395
24 Philadelphia Phillies .481 63 79 .444 .493 0 518 672 53-89 .373
25 Milwaukee Brewers .480 63 79 .444 .492 0 592 657 64-78 .448
26 Cincinnati Reds .480 59 82 .418 .500 0 620 748 57-84 .407
27 San Diego Padres .476 59 83 .415 .497 0 606 685 62-80 .439
28 Arizona Diamondbacks .473 58 83 .411 .494 0 644 801 55-86 .393
29 Minnesota Twins .472 53 89 .373 .505 0 657 796 58-84 .405
30 Atlanta Braves .468 55 87 .387 .494 0 548 696 54-88 .383

No comments:

Post a Comment