Friday, September 30, 2016

2016 MLB Relative Power Index (RPI),as of the games of September 29,2016 from ESPN.GO.COM

MLB RPI Rankings

RK TEAM RPI W L PCT SOS PWR RS RA EXPW-L EXPWP
1 Chicago Cubs .531 101 57 .639 .495 0 790 542 107-51 .680
2 Texas Rangers .526 94 65 .591 .504 0 757 746 81-78 .507
3 Boston Red Sox .523 92 67 .579 .505 0 869 685 98-61 .617
4 Cleveland Indians .518 91 67 .576 .499 0 761 669 89-69 .564
5 Baltimore Orioles .518 87 72 .547 .508 0 728 705 82-77 .516
6 Washington Nationals .517 93 66 .585 .494 0 747 597 97-62 .610
7 Toronto Blue Jays .516 87 72 .547 .505 0 750 657 90-69 .566
8 Seattle Mariners .512 85 74 .535 .505 0 753 694 86-73 .541
9 New York Yankees .511 83 76 .522 .507 0 670 686 78-81 .488
10 Houston Astros .510 83 76 .522 .505 0 719 686 83-76 .523
11 Los Angeles Dodgers .509 91 68 .572 .488 0 721 619 92-67 .576
12 Detroit Tigers .509 85 73 .538 .500 0 741 713 82-76 .519
13 Kansas City Royals .505 81 78 .509 .504 0 668 696 76-83 .479
14 St. Louis Cardinals .504 83 76 .522 .498 0 758 705 85-74 .536
15 New York Mets .504 85 74 .535 .493 0 659 608 86-73 .540
16 San Francisco Giants .500 84 75 .528 .491 0 696 627 88-71 .552
17 Chicago White Sox .499 77 82 .484 .504 0 676 700 77-82 .483
18 Pittsburgh Pirates .496 78 80 .494 .497 0 722 737 77-81 .490
19 Los Angeles Angels .495 72 87 .453 .510 0 702 722 77-82 .486
20 Miami Marlins .492 78 80 .494 .491 0 640 666 76-82 .480
21 Colorado Rockies .487 74 85 .465 .494 0 834 849 78-81 .491
22 Tampa Bay Rays .487 66 93 .415 .511 0 661 705 74-85 .468
23 Oakland Athletics .486 67 92 .421 .507 0 640 746 67-92 .424
24 Milwaukee Brewers .483 71 88 .447 .495 0 660 722 72-87 .455
25 Cincinnati Reds .481 67 92 .421 .501 0 702 836 66-93 .414
26 Philadelphia Phillies .480 70 89 .440 .494 0 601 784 59-100 .370
27 San Diego Padres .480 68 91 .428 .497 0 676 753 71-88 .446
28 Atlanta Braves .477 66 92 .418 .497 0 641 770 65-93 .409
29 Arizona Diamondbacks .476 66 93 .415 .496 0 735 880 65-94 .411
30 Minnesota Twins .468 57 102 .358 .504 0 707 879 62-97 .393

No comments:

Post a Comment